+- How2pass.com Forums (https://www.how2pass.com/forum)
+-- Forum: CCNP (https://www.how2pass.com/forum/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum (https://www.how2pass.com/forum/forum-19.html)
+--- Thread: QID:EC708 (/thread-2478.html)
QID:EC708 - chewosaurus - 06-04-2025
I believe the answer "If a router with a higher IP address and the same priority as the active router becomes available, that router becomes the new active router 5 seconds later.” is incorrect for this reasoning:
Even in the case of pre-emption on the new router -
Pre-emption triggers only when the newcomer’s priority is higher than the current active router. A higher IP address breaks a tie during the initial election, but it does not pre-empt an already-active router whose priority is equal. The 5-second delay therefore would not apply in that equal-priority scenario.
RE: QID:EC708 - help_desk - 06-06-2025
You are right. The answer has been corrected. Thank you!
RE: QID:EC708 - ionemoney - 06-11-2025
(06-06-2025, 09:55 AM)help_desk Wrote: You are right. The answer has been corrected. Thank you!
However, the answer: "The hello and Hold timers are set to custom values" is incorrect since hello and hold are 3 and 10 seconds respect...I think that even though the previous answer was ambiguous, it was the "best" choice like many Cisco answers....
RE: QID:EC708 - chewosaurus - 06-13-2025
(06-11-2025, 02:24 PM)ionemoney Wrote:(06-06-2025, 09:55 AM)help_desk Wrote: You are right. The answer has been corrected. Thank you!
However, the answer: "The hello and Hold timers are set to custom values" is incorrect since hello and hold are 3 and 10 seconds respect...I think that even though the previous answer was ambiguous, it was the "best" choice like many Cisco answers....
Yeah, I agree. I assume it's an issue with the output exhibit or a misprint. But to your point, if I had to choose a "best answer" I would still choose the one I raised.