https://www.how2pass.com/forum/ Wed, 28 Oct 2026 14:35:56 +0000 MyBB https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2983.html Wed, 28 Oct 2026 05:46:30 +0000 gentalet]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2983.html http://www.informed.com.pl/main/Regularn...-1925.html]]> http://www.informed.com.pl/main/Regularn...-1925.html]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2982.html Wed, 28 Oct 2026 05:36:25 +0000 sodatidecapsuleslegit]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2982.html There is no verified basis in this article to claim that Sodatide increases exercise performance or makes physical activity unnecessary. Consumers should be wary of advertisements promising effortless results without lifestyle changes.
Official Website:-
https://buy-sodatide.com/
Other Offers:-
https://stopwatt-saver.com/
https://glycozendrops.com/]]> There is no verified basis in this article to claim that Sodatide increases exercise performance or makes physical activity unnecessary. Consumers should be wary of advertisements promising effortless results without lifestyle changes.
Official Website:-
https://buy-sodatide.com/
Other Offers:-
https://stopwatt-saver.com/
https://glycozendrops.com/]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2961.html Wed, 16 Sep 2026 07:27:11 +0000 ratedr]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2961.html
I'm happy to share that I've passed the ENARSI exam.

I took it and failed initially, but retook it and passed the following week. (My nerves got the best of me, and I didnt do well because of it)

I got 4 Labs:

DMVPN IPSEC 

DHCP IPSLA & NetFLOW -This was a bit different from the one here, as it used TCP-Connect and not ICMP-ECHO.

EIGRP VRF

Redistribution

The multiple-choice questions were some new ones but if you studied and Used How2Pass you will Pass4Sure.

I scored a 100 and 90s in the score report. So passed with flying colors.]]>
I'm happy to share that I've passed the ENARSI exam.

I took it and failed initially, but retook it and passed the following week. (My nerves got the best of me, and I didnt do well because of it)

I got 4 Labs:

DMVPN IPSEC 

DHCP IPSLA & NetFLOW -This was a bit different from the one here, as it used TCP-Connect and not ICMP-ECHO.

EIGRP VRF

Redistribution

The multiple-choice questions were some new ones but if you studied and Used How2Pass you will Pass4Sure.

I scored a 100 and 90s in the score report. So passed with flying colors.]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2952.html Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:54:41 +0000 elpotatoexperto]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2952.html https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2928.html Mon, 07 Sep 2026 06:09:46 +0000 jsqwe2]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2928.html Anyway, I think I've gone through all the questions. I've been noting down the ones I think are wrong:

### AR528 ###
Not sure why this answer was changed. You can see from the traceroute that the loop occurs because R3 is receiving the route from R1 for 172.16.0.0/16. So we need to stop R1 from advertising 172.16.0.0/16 when OSPF is redistributed into EIGRP.
Original answer was correct:
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1 1 1 1 1 route-map LOOPFILT
!
route-map LOOPFILT deny 10
match ip address 15
!
route-map LOOPFILT permit 20
!
access-list 15 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255


### AR126  ###
The question isn't asking about how the matched traffic is treated, it's asking about the effects of the route-map. Anything not matched by the access-list will go on to sequence 10.

Answers should be:
Packets are forwarded using normal route lookup.
Packets are evaluated by sequence 10.


### AR303  ###
Correct answer should be in the in direction for area 20 on router R2
This prevents area 5 from being advertised IN to area 20, while still being advertised to other internal areas.
Current answer of out direction for area 20 would target advertisements FROM area 20 going into areas 0 and 10.


### AR301 ###
Split horizon is synonymous with reverse poisoning, so it's implied that split horizon is already enabled.
Correct answer: Configure route filtering.


### AR515 ###
Based on the output md5 authentication has been enabled under the interface and not under the ospf process.
That's why it shows "Cryptographic authentication enabled" under "show ip ospf int gig 2".
This information is not displayed under the interface if authentication is enabled under the ospf process.

Answer should be:
key chain ospf
key 1
  key-string 7 02050D480809
  cryptographic-algorithm hmac-sha-1
!
int GigabitEthernet2
  ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 Cisco
  ip ospf authentication message-digest


### AR471 ####
R5 has a log message saying that "10.0.0.17 is not update-source Loopback0's address (10.10.10.5)", meaning that it current has Loopback0 as its update-source.
R6 has the P2P address of 10.0.0.17 as the neighbor address for R5, so changing the update source on R5 is the best solution.

Answer should be:
R5(config)# router bgp 65101
R5(config-router)# no neighbor 10.0.0.18 update-source Loopback0


### AR398 ###
Given answer stops the routing loop, the question is asking which one CAUSES a routing loop lol
Correct answer should be:
router ospf 1
distribute-list route-map deny_tag20 in

router ospf 1
redistribute rip subnets tag 20
!
route-map deny_tag20 permit 10
match tag 20
route-map deny tag20 permit 20


### AR380 ###
Given answer is wrong, destination guard utilizes the binding table.
Answer should be: IPv6 Prefix Guard

The IPv6 Prefix Guard feature works within the IPv6 Source Guard feature, enabling the device to deny traffic
originated from nontopologically correct addresses. IPv6 prefix guard is often used when IPv6 prefixes are
delegated to devices (for example, home gateways) using DHCP prefix delegation. The feature discovers
ranges of addresses assigned to the link and blocks any traffic sourced with an address outside this range.
To determine which prefixes should be allowed and which prefixes should be blocked, IPv6 prefix guard uses
the following:
• Prefix glean in Router Advertisements (RAs)
• Prefix glean in DHCP prefix delegation
• Static configuration
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/io...-guard.pdf


### AR597 ###
Answer should be:
VPN route target communities
MP-BGP peering of VPN community PE devices

An Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)-based virtual private network (VPN) has three major components:

- VPN route target communities—A VPN route target community is a list of all members of a VPN community. VPN route targets need to be configured for each VPN community member.

- Multiprotocol BGP (MP-BGP) peering of VPN community provider edge (PE) devices—MP-BGP propagates virtual routing and forwarding (VRF) reachability information to all members of a VPN community. MP-BGP peering must be configured on all PE devices within a VPN community.

- MPLS forwarding—MPLS transports all traffic between all VPN community members across a VPN service-provider network.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/sw...vl_scy_f1b


### AR640 ###
Given answer is wrong - IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) Guard does not inherently require or use the binding table to block rogue router advertisements, as it relies primarily on port-based policies and interface trust states.
Source: https://oneuptime.com/blog/post/2026-03-...urity/view

Correct answer should be: captures any type of user traffic to create a binding table
IPv6 Snooping learns and secures bindings for stateless autoconfiguration addresses in Layer 2 neighbor tables
and analyzes ND messages in order to build a trusted binding table.
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ro...ing-xe.pdf

I could be wrong on some of these. Please share your thoughts!]]> Anyway, I think I've gone through all the questions. I've been noting down the ones I think are wrong:

### AR528 ###
Not sure why this answer was changed. You can see from the traceroute that the loop occurs because R3 is receiving the route from R1 for 172.16.0.0/16. So we need to stop R1 from advertising 172.16.0.0/16 when OSPF is redistributed into EIGRP.
Original answer was correct:
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1 metric 1 1 1 1 1 route-map LOOPFILT
!
route-map LOOPFILT deny 10
match ip address 15
!
route-map LOOPFILT permit 20
!
access-list 15 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255


### AR126  ###
The question isn't asking about how the matched traffic is treated, it's asking about the effects of the route-map. Anything not matched by the access-list will go on to sequence 10.

Answers should be:
Packets are forwarded using normal route lookup.
Packets are evaluated by sequence 10.


### AR303  ###
Correct answer should be in the in direction for area 20 on router R2
This prevents area 5 from being advertised IN to area 20, while still being advertised to other internal areas.
Current answer of out direction for area 20 would target advertisements FROM area 20 going into areas 0 and 10.


### AR301 ###
Split horizon is synonymous with reverse poisoning, so it's implied that split horizon is already enabled.
Correct answer: Configure route filtering.


### AR515 ###
Based on the output md5 authentication has been enabled under the interface and not under the ospf process.
That's why it shows "Cryptographic authentication enabled" under "show ip ospf int gig 2".
This information is not displayed under the interface if authentication is enabled under the ospf process.

Answer should be:
key chain ospf
key 1
  key-string 7 02050D480809
  cryptographic-algorithm hmac-sha-1
!
int GigabitEthernet2
  ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 Cisco
  ip ospf authentication message-digest


### AR471 ####
R5 has a log message saying that "10.0.0.17 is not update-source Loopback0's address (10.10.10.5)", meaning that it current has Loopback0 as its update-source.
R6 has the P2P address of 10.0.0.17 as the neighbor address for R5, so changing the update source on R5 is the best solution.

Answer should be:
R5(config)# router bgp 65101
R5(config-router)# no neighbor 10.0.0.18 update-source Loopback0


### AR398 ###
Given answer stops the routing loop, the question is asking which one CAUSES a routing loop lol
Correct answer should be:
router ospf 1
distribute-list route-map deny_tag20 in

router ospf 1
redistribute rip subnets tag 20
!
route-map deny_tag20 permit 10
match tag 20
route-map deny tag20 permit 20


### AR380 ###
Given answer is wrong, destination guard utilizes the binding table.
Answer should be: IPv6 Prefix Guard

The IPv6 Prefix Guard feature works within the IPv6 Source Guard feature, enabling the device to deny traffic
originated from nontopologically correct addresses. IPv6 prefix guard is often used when IPv6 prefixes are
delegated to devices (for example, home gateways) using DHCP prefix delegation. The feature discovers
ranges of addresses assigned to the link and blocks any traffic sourced with an address outside this range.
To determine which prefixes should be allowed and which prefixes should be blocked, IPv6 prefix guard uses
the following:
• Prefix glean in Router Advertisements (RAs)
• Prefix glean in DHCP prefix delegation
• Static configuration
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/io...-guard.pdf


### AR597 ###
Answer should be:
VPN route target communities
MP-BGP peering of VPN community PE devices

An Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)-based virtual private network (VPN) has three major components:

- VPN route target communities—A VPN route target community is a list of all members of a VPN community. VPN route targets need to be configured for each VPN community member.

- Multiprotocol BGP (MP-BGP) peering of VPN community provider edge (PE) devices—MP-BGP propagates virtual routing and forwarding (VRF) reachability information to all members of a VPN community. MP-BGP peering must be configured on all PE devices within a VPN community.

- MPLS forwarding—MPLS transports all traffic between all VPN community members across a VPN service-provider network.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/sw...vl_scy_f1b


### AR640 ###
Given answer is wrong - IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) Guard does not inherently require or use the binding table to block rogue router advertisements, as it relies primarily on port-based policies and interface trust states.
Source: https://oneuptime.com/blog/post/2026-03-...urity/view

Correct answer should be: captures any type of user traffic to create a binding table
IPv6 Snooping learns and secures bindings for stateless autoconfiguration addresses in Layer 2 neighbor tables
and analyzes ND messages in order to build a trusted binding table.
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ro...ing-xe.pdf

I could be wrong on some of these. Please share your thoughts!]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2925.html Sun, 06 Sep 2026 18:52:07 +0000 elpotatoexperto]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2925.html
I know the SCOR testing has updated to the 2.0 sets. 

Is this test set still accurate for the actual 300-710 test?]]>
I know the SCOR testing has updated to the 2.0 sets. 

Is this test set still accurate for the actual 300-710 test?]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2922.html Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:45:56 +0000 adilnasser3]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2922.html
Please review and provide feedback.

Adil]]>
Please review and provide feedback.

Adil]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2920.html Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:02:03 +0000 forumsupport]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2920.html

Last Date to Test for v1.1: February 2, 2027

v2.0 Launch Date: February 3, 2027

Community Advice & Recommendation
If you are currently studying for your CCNA or plan to get certified soon, targeting the v1.1 exam before February 2, 2027, is strongly recommended.

• Why take v1.1: A vast amount of study material, practice questions, and lab solutions for the current v1.1 blueprint are already mature and widely available.
  
• What to expect in v2.0: The upcoming v2.0 exam introduces major shifts, including a brand-new focus on Artificial Intelligence (AI) operations, advanced scenario-based troubleshooting, and a lack of mature resources immediately following its launch.
  

Locking in your attempt before the cutoff allows you to test against a predictable, well-documented exam pool. Once passed, your certification will remain valid for the standard three years.]]>

Last Date to Test for v1.1: February 2, 2027

v2.0 Launch Date: February 3, 2027

Community Advice & Recommendation
If you are currently studying for your CCNA or plan to get certified soon, targeting the v1.1 exam before February 2, 2027, is strongly recommended.

• Why take v1.1: A vast amount of study material, practice questions, and lab solutions for the current v1.1 blueprint are already mature and widely available.
  
• What to expect in v2.0: The upcoming v2.0 exam introduces major shifts, including a brand-new focus on Artificial Intelligence (AI) operations, advanced scenario-based troubleshooting, and a lack of mature resources immediately following its launch.
  

Locking in your attempt before the cutoff allows you to test against a predictable, well-documented exam pool. Once passed, your certification will remain valid for the standard three years.]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2911.html Tue, 25 Aug 2026 12:14:00 +0000 Solidus]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2911.html Please fix it, maybe i'm wrong, but I think AS PREPEND is always used on OUT.

Any feedback would be great.]]> Please fix it, maybe i'm wrong, but I think AS PREPEND is always used on OUT.

Any feedback would be great.]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2908.html Thu, 20 Aug 2026 20:43:29 +0000 adilnasser3]]> https://www.how2pass.com/forum/thread-2908.html
The correct answer should be:

A permit 20 statement should be added before completing the ACL with the required prefixes, and then the permit 20 statement can be removed.

Adil]]>
The correct answer should be:

A permit 20 statement should be added before completing the ACL with the required prefixes, and then the permit 20 statement can be removed.

Adil]]>