Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
3rd times the charm! PASS...
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: sgtwardo
Yesterday, 06:20 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 3,556
|
QID:AN1000
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
10-17-2025, 10:47 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 157
|
QID:AND84
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
10-16-2025, 09:38 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 188
|
CML YAML Files - Not work...
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
10-11-2025, 12:15 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 309
|
Passed ENSARI - My Recomm...
Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
Last Post: chewosaurus
10-06-2025, 02:26 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,080
|
How2Pass 200-201 CBROPS C...
Forum: Cybersecurity Associate - CBROPS 200-201 Forum
Last Post: forumsupport
10-05-2025, 06:32 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 214
|
CCNP 300-101 Questions
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: ncc16ncc
10-03-2025, 10:31 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 22,090
|
Missing pka file 802.1Q T...
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
09-29-2025, 11:36 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 689
|
IPv4 and IPv6 Assignment ...
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: help_desk
09-29-2025, 11:21 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 694
|
PBR and Redistribution Si...
Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
Last Post: greaterzen1
09-24-2025, 04:47 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1,023
|
|
|
AR 330 |
Posted by: pc_evans - 02-24-2024, 07:19 AM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- Replies (3)
|
 |
You cannot configure multiple vrfs on an ospf instance you need a separate instance for each VRF.
If it was possible to configure multiple VRF's on an ospf instance, using separate instances would not be wrong.
P2#sh run | section router
P2#
P2#
P2#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
P2(config)#router ospf 10 vrf Site-A
P2(config-router)#
*Feb 24 07:16:28.883: %OSPF-4-NORTRID: OSPF process 10 failed to allocate unique router-id and cannot start
P2(config-router)#router-id 10.10.10.10
P2(config-router)#exit
P2(config)#
P2(config)#router ospf 10 vrf SharedSites
%VRF specified does not match existing router
P2(config)#
P2(config)#
P2(config)#
P2(config)#router ospf 20 vrf SharedSites
P2(config-router)#
*Feb 24 07:17:31.696: %OSPF-4-NORTRID: OSPF process 20 failed to allocate unique router-id and cannot start
P2(config-router)#router-id 20.20.20.20
P2(config-router)#exit
P2(config)#
P2(config)#
|
|
|
AR 370 |
Posted by: pc_evans - 02-24-2024, 05:41 AM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- Replies (1)
|
 |
I built this in GNS3. The ACL only prohibits TCP 179 and I was still getting this debug
ICMP: dst (10.255.255.1) administratively prohibited unreachable rcv from 10.0.12.2
I used wireshark and realized that i was getting a notification via ICMP that the TCP attempt was prohibited by R2. In short, the ACL blocks TCP 179, P2 uses ICMP to Notify PE1 of the prohibited TCP 179 traffic. Thus the ICMP Unreachable.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JdEY_gy...sp=sharing
PE1#
PE1#debug ip tcp trans
TCP special event debugging is on
PE1#debug ip icmp
ICMP packet debugging is on
PE1#clear ip bgp *
PE1#
PE1#
PE1#
*Feb 24 05:28:02.013: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION_MANY: sent to 1 sessions 6/4 (Administrative Reset) for all peers
PE1#
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCBF7660230 created
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCBF7660230 setting property TCP_VRFTABLEID (20) F7656CC4
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCBF7660230 setting property TCP_MD5KEY (4) 0
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCBF7660230 setting property TCP_ACK_RATE (37) F784127C
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCBF7660230 setting property TCP_TOS (11) F7841290
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCBF7660230 setting property TCP_PMTU (45) F7841248
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCBF7660230 setting property TCP_RTRANSTMO (36) F7841278
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: tcp_uniqueport: using ephemeral max 65535
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCP: Random local port generated 49575, network 1
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCBF7660230 bound to 10.255.255.1.49575
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: Reserved port 49575 in Transport Port Agent for TCP IP type 1
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCBF7660230 getting property TCP_STRICT_ADDR_BIND (19)
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCP: pmtu enabled,mss is now set to 1460
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCP: sending SYN, seq 1784972807, ack 0
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCP0: Connection to 10.255.255.3:179, advertising MSS 1460
*Feb 24 05:28:07.362: TCP0: state was CLOSED -> SYNSENT [49575 -> 10.255.255.3(179)]
*Feb 24 05:28:07.364: ICMP: dst (10.255.255.1) administratively prohibited unreachable rcv from 10.0.12.2
PE1#
*Feb 24 05:28:07.364: TCP0: ICMP destination unreachable received
*Feb 24 05:28:07.364: Released port 49575 in Transport Port Agent for TCP IP type 1 delay 240000
*Feb 24 05:28:07.364: TCP0: state was SYNSENT -> CLOSED [49575 -> 10.255.255.3(179)]
*Feb 24 05:28:07.364: TCB 0xF7660230 destroyed
PE1#und all
|
|
|
AR402 |
Posted by: pc_evans - 02-24-2024, 01:52 AM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Correct answer is to Add a static router to the 8.8.8.8/32 destination through next hop 203.0.113.1
Ethernet 0/0 is used for the ISP1 default route.
Ethernet 0/1 is used for the ISP2 default route.
The default route named ISP1 will not come up unless 8.8.8.8 is reachable. 8.8.8.8 is not reachable without a default route.
Adding a static route to 8.8.8.8 tells the router how to reach SLA1's target so the default route can come up without the need for the other static route (ISP2).
|
|
|
ar407 |
Posted by: pc_evans - 02-23-2024, 08:28 PM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Correct answer is to configure ebgp multihop on RB. the output of RD shows that ebgp-multihop is configured on RD. See below example of how ebgp multihop is shown in the command output for bpg neighbors.
IOU2(config-router)#do sh run | section router bgp
router bgp 200
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 100
IOU2(config-router)#
IOU2(config-router)#do show ip bgp neigh | inc External BGP neighbor
External BGP neighbor not directly connected. <-- multihop not configured
External BGP neighbor configured for connected checks (single-hop no-disable-connected-check)
IOU2(config-router)#
IOU2(config-router)#
IOU2(config-router)#neigh 1.1.1.1 ebgp-multihop 3 <-- Configure Multihop
IOU2(config-router)#
IOU2(config-router)#do show ip bgp neigh | inc External BGP neighbor
External BGP neighbor may be up to 3 hops away. <-- output showing multihop is configured.
External BGP neighbor NOT configured for connected checks (multi-hop no-disable-connected-check)
IOU2(config-router)#
IOU2(config-router)#
IOU2(config-router)#neigh 1.1.1.1 ebgp-multihop 10
IOU2(config-router)#do show ip bgp neigh | inc External BGP neighbor
External BGP neighbor may be up to 10 hops away.
External BGP neighbor NOT configured for connected checks (multi-hop no-disable-connected-check)
IOU2(config-router)#
###example once ebgp multihop is configured on opposite router.
IOU2#sh ip bgp neigh | inc remote router ID
BGP version 4, remote router ID 1.1.1.1
|
|
|
AR007 |
Posted by: pc_evans - 02-19-2024, 03:04 PM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Per the link in the explanation.
"The weight is assigned locally to the router. The value only makes sense to the specific router."
"Unlike the weight attribute, which is only relevant to the local router, local preference is an attribute that routers exchange in the same AS."
Changing the weight on another router will not impact forwarding decisions made by this router.
|
|
|
|