Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
|
|
ar457 wrong |
Posted by: serbancalin - 1 hour ago - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- No Replies
|
 |
Please check the answers:
-R1 has destination 10.60.66.66 instead of 10.66.66.66
-Primary path is thought R4, however the access list should be modify on R4
|
|
|
Exam experience 350-401 |
Posted by: ionemoney - Yesterday, 07:08 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
- No Replies
|
 |
Just passed the Exam Today! There are 6 Sims and 54 questions. One of the Sims asked to create a flow exporter and I failed that one as I got stuck with the syntax and the dash in between words that CLI was not accepting so after spending about 10 mins I decided to skip to next one...I still do not know what the issue was after getting home and searching.... I also got stuck on a VRF Sim that for some reason I could not ping from one router to the other using the tunnel...I was able to ping from one PC though.... Pretty much the others are very similar to the ones on how2. The questions I got around 70 percent similar to the ones here. Overall. it is quiet intense and covers lots of topics. I wanted to say Thank you to How2 for helping to prepare for it. I think this will be my last time I try re-certify with Cisco as It is becoming more complex and irrelevant to what actually a Network Eng. daily work is...... Thanks for everything and good luck to the others!
|
|
|
OSPF Sumary SIM #3 |
Posted by: ionemoney - 07-28-2025, 02:12 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
- No Replies
|
 |
Kind of tricky if you are not very familiar how this works...
On task #2 it states that:
The OSPF process ID on both R2 and R3 is 1.
All interfaces of R2 belong to 10.1.0.0/16 subnet.
All interfaces of R3 belong to 10.2.0.0/16 subnet
Not all interfaces on R2 are in 10.1.0.0/16....shouldn't it say "All Int of R2 in Area 10 belong to...
same goes for R3..?
thanks
|
|
|
QID:AR126 |
Posted by: chewosaurus - 07-28-2025, 01:39 PM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- No Replies
|
 |
I think this question's answers may be wrong, although not 100%.
I think the wording of the question isn't ideal as it's asking how traffic is treated however the implication is that the focus is on the ACL "NON-CISCO"
[*]"Packets are forwarded using normal route lookup."
Correct
A deny In a route-map for PBR causes the matched traffic to bypass policy routing and be routed using the normal routing table (RIB/FIB) NOT DROPPED.
[*]"Packets are not evaluated by sequence 10."
Correct
Once a route-map sequence matches (even a deny), no further sequences are evaluated. The logic stops at the first match.
The current correct answers:
"Packets are forwarded to the default gateway."
There's literally no mention or evidence of a default gateway, and if we are referring to the traffic classified in ACL "NON-CISCO" this is definitely not the case as it already matches on seq 5.
"Packets are evaluated by sequence 10."
Again, are we referring the the ACL classified traffic? If we are then again definitely not, as it's already matched on seq 5.
Thanks
|
|
|
QID:AR143 has wrong answer |
Posted by: GreaterZen - 07-27-2025, 07:18 PM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hi forum support / admin
According to QID:AR143 explanation end paragraph:
"Manually configuring an ipv6 address on router 2 will it an address on the same subnet as router 1. This will allow router 2 to successfully telnet." Yet the answer correct answer is "permit ip any any on access-lit egress." I would add pictures if i could. Nonetheless, please fix.
Thanks,
GreaterZen
|
|
|
Etherchannel and root bridge Sim |
Posted by: ionemoney - 07-26-2025, 11:52 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
- Replies (1)
|
 |
The answer has the interfaces grouped into po11, and configured as trunk interfaces
no interface po11
interface range e0/0 - 2
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 11 mode active
However, don't we have to specifically configure int po11 as a trunk as well?
EX
Interface po11
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
Switchport trunk allowed vlans x,x,x
?????
|
|
|
Experiencing problems with Sim-VRF R2 |
Posted by: greaterzen1 - 07-25-2025, 06:12 PM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hello,
I've experienced a problem with the sim-VRF. On R2 after enabling ip cef and placing the vrf (cu-red / cu-green) on the appreciate interfaces with the ip addresses nothing shows up in the respected routing tables. To my knowledge all that is needed for vrf to work:
- enable ip cef
- create the vrf with either ip vrf <vrf name> or vrf definition <vrf name>
- add the vrf to an interface
Although, I redownloaded the file the problem on R2 still persist. I've recreated this lab in eve-ng and it works. Could you please help?
P.S per the solution ip cef should be turned off for R1 and R2. However, i noticed in the sim-vrf file it is only turned off for R2 and not R1.
|
|
|
QID:AR541 |
Posted by: chewosaurus - 07-25-2025, 03:43 PM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Answer is incorrect, it is not the choice with the route-map config. It is even stated in the explanation section that the route-map and ACL are a trick as they aren't being used as part of redistribution in the output, therefore any changes to the route-map or ACL don't have an effect at all.
Correct answer is the answer which states "default metric 10000 100 255 100 1500" because it adds a default-metric under EIGRP, which is required to redistribute RIP routes. This ensures RIP-learned networks (like 192.168.2.0/24) are properly advertised into EIGRP and reach R2 and R4.
Thanks
|
|
|
DMVPN Configuration Sim Help |
Posted by: GreaterZen - 07-21-2025, 11:54 PM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum
- Replies (2)
|
 |
HI,
I'm working on the DMVPN SIM using the GNS3 Lab and I am running into trouble here. I followed the configuration solutions, which is as follows:
BR1
interface tunnel 0
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
tunnel source e0/1
tunnel mode gre multipoint
tunnel key 100
ip nhrp network-id 100
ip nhrp authentication ccnp123
ip nhrp map 192.168.1.254 10.10.255.254
ip nhrp map multicast 10.10.255.254
ip nhrp holdtime 300
ip nhrp nhs 192.168.1.254
BR2
interface tunnel 0
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
tunnel source e0/1
tunnel mode gre multipoint
tunnel key 100
ip nhrp network-id 100
ip nhrp authentication ccnp123
ip nhrp map 192.168.1.254 10.10.255.254
ip nhrp map multicast 10.10.255.254
ip nhrp holdtime 300
ip nhrp nhs 192.168.1.254
with the crypto ipsec fragmentation before-encryption on both routers as well as ip mtu 1400 and ip tcp adjust-mss 1360. As well as applying the ipsec_profile. However, when I do the traceroute i get this:
tracing the route to 172.16.1.254
1 192.168.1.254 2 msec 1 msec 1msec
2 * * *
3* * *
%DMVPN-6-NHRP_RESOLUTION_REPLY: TUNNEL0: Host with (Tunnel: 192.168.1.1 NBMA: 10.10.255.1) Received Resolution Reply from (Tunnel: 172.16.2.254 NBMA: 10.10.255.254)
Some help or assistance to why the solution does not work would greatly be appreciated
Thanks
|
|
|
|