Decimal 172 is equal to hex value ac, therefore the following solution is correct:

Configure option 43 Hex F104.AC10.3205

So before I start, I am currently CCNA certified and working on CCNP.  I understand this much...

• prefix-lists and access-lists are used to collect a pool of IP's or subnets to compare and contrast from
  
  
• route-maps and distribution-lists look to those prefix-lists and access-lists or other criteria to make a decision on how to handle those pools of IP's, whether to permit them, forward them, block them from entering the AS or routing table.
  
  
• distribution-lists only affect the IP routing table, not the AS topology information, meaning if R1, a DR in an OSPF topology within area 0 were using a distribution-list to block network 192.168.5.0/24 - it would only block it from R1's routing table (show ip route) rather than the OSPF topology (show ip ospf topology) so 192.168.5.0/24 would still propogate to other routers ospf topology and ip routing table if there were no additional filters preventing it from doing so.
  
  
• As for route-maps - they can do alot of stuff from what I'm gathering, blocking or permitting traffic is only one of them, they can also redistribute traffic along another path using a next-hop argument. Anyway though, in this context, a route-map would block the network from the entire AS if its implemented on a ASBR.
  

• Can you use route summaries in prefix-lists to block out everything in the summarized route?
  
  
• Can you modify the ge / le qualifiers in this example to only include 10.20.0.0 thru 10.20.5.255?
  
  
• What would happen if my prefix-list instead permitted the routes and denied 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 (is that even necessary, this should be implicitly denied right?) If I did that, how would I implement it on the route-map to block the IP's permitted in the prefix-list? Would this be appropriate or would it block out all routes? Would the below be appropiate? If not, what would be best to filter those nodes out from the EIGRP routing table while keeping it in this syntax (with the prefix-lists permitting).
  

I took the test today and passed with an 867. There were 105 questions on the exam with 17 questions that were not available on how2pass however what was provided is surely appreciated. Thanks again how2pass, I’ve been a loyal customer for 7 years with more to come.

Is the given solution verified?
I thought a service-policy is used to apply a QoS policy (poicy-map) to an interface
and that you can enforce (define) rate-limiting with a policy map.
From a configuration point of view, which data (class-map), which action (policy-map), is imposed on which interface (service-policy).
...and "policing" I would call a technique or mechanism and not a tool, so I am a bit confused by the given solution

I passed the CCNA today with an 895. How2Pass is the best study guide around.

Hello all, I passed my exam in November and How2pass was of great help. Study the past questions and you will be ok.

Hi All.
Thanks for this website.  I have just passed the CCNA exams TODAY and can confirm that the materials on this site are very good and all the questions were similar. Do not hesitate to contact me for any questions.

Thanks to the Admin Team for the wonderful job you are doing.

TCP sends the packet as a stream, not an individual
 https://community.cisco.com/t5/networkin...-p/3114870
CAN YOU PLEASE FIX IT

IPv6 Source Guard  - Filters inbound traffic on layer 2 switchports that are not in the IPv6 binding tables
IPv6 RA Guard - Block Malicious host and permits the router from a legitimate hosts

If no version is mentioned SNMP should default to version 1 - Device SNMP is already using version 1, no need to change this.

Therefore "configure SNMP rw permission in addition to version 1" - cannot be correct otherwise we would still have the same issue.

The only other feasible answer has to be an ACL issue.