Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Latest Threads
QID: AN437
Forum: Answer this question
Last Post: slawekstec
09-27-2022, 12:51 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 13
dynamic and reflexive acc...
Forum: CCNP TSHOOT 300-135
Last Post: jgreenlee
09-24-2022, 07:41 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 5,610
Exam Experience
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401
Last Post: mrderekb
09-11-2022, 12:47 PM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 3,463
EC546
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401
Last Post: ionemoney
08-25-2022, 11:20 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 569
Barely Passed!
Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410
Last Post: Kuroneko
08-06-2022, 01:41 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 310
AR248
Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410
Last Post: Kuroneko
08-05-2022, 04:48 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 251
AR135
Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410
Last Post: Kuroneko
08-05-2022, 05:39 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 237
AR369
Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410
Last Post: Kuroneko
08-04-2022, 05:50 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 249
Ar340
Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410
Last Post: Kuroneko
08-04-2022, 04:46 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 446
AR385
Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410
Last Post: forumsupport
08-04-2022, 12:41 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 332

 
  February 2022 (Any known updates?)
Posted by: bitlc01 - 02-07-2022, 02:09 PM - Forum: General - Replies (6)

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

I'm about to take the "CCNA 200-301" on the upcoming month.
My question is, is the pool still updated ? Because it seems a while ago since the last update.

Yours sincerely,
Michael

Print this item

  Passed CCNA
Posted by: son1c - 12-28-2021, 10:19 AM - Forum: Exam Experience - No Replies

Hi,
 
Yesterday i passed the CCNA 200-301 exam.
The practice test are accurate and I can only recommend it.

Thankyou

Print this item

  EC161 - EBG
Posted by: jsmith - 12-23-2021, 09:27 AM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 - No Replies

I wanted to discuss this question. I don't think the answer specified is correct. If the peering was going to be via the loopback IPs then two things would be required:

a) A static route to the loopback IPs on the opposing router
b) EBGP multihop to allow peering via loopback.


Neither of these are shown in this configuration. 

My gut feel is the answer should be the peering on the 10.24.24. addresses with the update source command for looopback?

What are peoples thoughts on this?


Thanks

Print this item

  EC404
Posted by: jsmith - 12-21-2021, 08:06 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 - Replies (2)

There is a typo in the answer to this question. All of the source static statements have the same IP address.

Print this item

  QID:AX001 - example is incorrect
Posted by: aktiont4 - 12-14-2021, 05:40 PM - Forum: General - No Replies

FF01::101 is NOT a multicast address that represents all NTP servers...

It should be FF05::101 as per https:\\doc.ntp.org/archives/4.2.0/assoc/

Print this item

  Test #7 Drag and Drop
Posted by: jdrury73 - 12-13-2021, 05:23 PM - Forum: Answer this question - Replies (2)

Whenever I do the full test, some of the answers always come up wrong and says my answer was N/A, as if I did not answer those. I do completely answer these. When I repeat just those questions, with the same answers, I get it right. Not sure what is wrong with these. I've copied them down.

QID:AND08
QID:AND29
QID:AND29
QID:AND30
QID:AND31
QID:AND32


Thanks,

Joe

Print this item

  QID:AN354
Posted by: jdrury73 - 12-13-2021, 03:25 AM - Forum: Answer this question - No Replies

I recreated this scenario in packet tracer and didn't work as the answer suggests. Even though this command ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::14/64 fd00:12::2 200 includes the host address, the /64 suggests this is a floating static network route. The question wants a host /128 route.

I think these should be the answers to the question. This solution did work in packet tracer.

ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::/64 fd00:12::2
ipv6 route 2001:db8:23::14/128 fd00:13::3

Thanks,

Joe

Print this item

  EC180
Posted by: jsmith - 12-07-2021, 07:28 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 - Replies (2)

Hi

I there are two duplicate answers that are the same in this question. Something appears wrong. I think one was supposed to be a standard access list maybe ?

Print this item

  EC266
Posted by: jsmith - 12-06-2021, 02:24 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 - Replies (2)

Please can this question be fixed? The VRF names are wrong in the answers.

Print this item

Bug Typo in AN354
Posted by: son1c - 12-05-2021, 05:47 PM - Forum: Answer this question - Replies (3)

In AN354 is a typo.

2001:db8:2::/64 should be 2001:db8:23::/64

Cu

Print this item