Can you please check, shouldn't the answer be "Check and resolve reachability between WLC and NTP server"

The alert mentions about lag between DNA Center & WLC, 

if there was an issue between NTP Server & DNA Center, then there would have been multiple alerts from all other devices too regarding the time lag, but the exhibit only shows WLC issue.

Also, assuming from the exhibit, if you look at bottom left, the Top 10 issues is selected and alert is P2, So it's probably a device(WLC) issue.

The DNA & NTP reachability would cause P1

Please review, I think the correct answer should be 

Define a delay timer under track 1

For example :
track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
delay down 10 up 10



Changing the threshold(RTT) to 1500 ms won't solve the issue

Please review, the correct option should be 

"Police the pir for BGP, conform-action transmit, and exceed action transmit"

to avoid dropping the BGP packets, which is causing the BGP flapping/re-calculations

Please Check, I think the correct option is to configure interface bandwidth on all routers, I tested in LAB, 
and traffic did flow through CapeTown --> Tokyo --> Dubai router after following

! Configuration for Cape Town
interface E 0/0
bandwidth 5000
interface E 0/1
bandwidth 10000

! Configuration for Dubai
interface E 0/0
bandwidth 50000
interface E 0/1
bandwidth 5000

! Configuration for Tokyo
interface E 0/0
bandwidth 50000
interface E 0/1
bandwidth 10000

Please review this drag and drop for accuracy.

This is wrong. Here’s why:

• Autonomous Access Point
  ✅ Should have:
  
  • Supports different operational modes
    
  • Accessible for management via Telnet, SSH, or a Web GUI
    ❌ Your version incorrectly says “Requires a management IP address” (that applies to Lightweight APs).
    
• Lightweight Access Point
  ✅ Should have:
  
  • Configured and managed by a WLC
    
  • Requires a management IP address
    ❌ Your version incorrectly says “Supports different operational modes” (that applies to Autonomous APs).
    

• Supports different operational modes
  
• Accessible for management via Telnet, SSH, or a Web GUI
  

• Configured and managed by a WLC
  
• Requires a management IP address
  

Please review, 

Answer should be  It has sub-second failure detection for layer 1 and layer 3 problems

I don't see PacketTracer download links for 'Local User, NACL and Security Sim, and IPv4 and IPv6 Deployment Sim

Please review, I think the correct option is 

access-list 1 deny host 192.168.1.1
access-list 1 permit any
route-map CCNP permit 10
match ip address 1
set ip precedence critical
interface g0/0/0
ip address 192.168.1.4 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map CCNP


As the above will mark all traffic with "Critical IP Precedence" except for the 192.168.1.1

I just want to confirm if the written tasks are complete? 

This is the most vague tasks that I have seen so far so I just want to confirm if this type of writing is what to expect in the actually exam.

Please check, 

I think all the given options are wrong. Due to OSPF's behavior of preferring intra-area routes (O) over inter-area routes (O IA)

R2 will always send traffic to R3 (intra area) no matter the cost of link. 


Thanks