Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Latest Threads
EC902
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: sgtwardo
5 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 5
Netflow & IP SLA Sim
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: networman
Yesterday, 02:39 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 25
VRF Configuration Sim #2
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
06-28-2025, 10:35 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 331
Cisco Command Line - Shor...
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: forumsupport
06-26-2025, 03:49 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 288
QID:EC902
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
06-25-2025, 10:23 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 539
QID:EC172
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
06-21-2025, 08:08 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 826
QID:EC972
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: chewosaurus
06-18-2025, 05:42 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 239
QID:EC1223
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
06-14-2025, 11:07 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 452
QID:EC708
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: chewosaurus
06-13-2025, 01:41 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 1,132
QID:EC082
Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum
Last Post: help_desk
06-11-2025, 10:14 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 562

 
  QID AN253
Posted by: alaska_nelly - 02-15-2021, 05:04 AM - Forum: Answer this question - Replies (2)

That question asks:



"Which two WAN architecture options help a business improve scalability and reliability for the network?"




I believe that the current answer of 'dual-home branches'  and 'dynamic routing' is incorrect. 

The actual answer appears to be 'dual home-branches'  and  'asynchronous routing' according to multiple sites and a duplicate question on How2pass (unsure of the QID it did show up, you will have to research it).

Could you research and fix this if needed, please?

Print this item

  QID AN034
Posted by: alaska_nelly - 02-15-2021, 02:13 AM - Forum: Answer this question - Replies (2)

I believe that the current answer of 'passive' is incorrect. It is the neighbor S2 that is passive. And that question asks:

"Refer to the Exhibit. Based on the LACP neighbor status, in which mode is the SW1 port-channel configured?"

I believe the answer would be 'active.'

I went out and checked many free testing sites and they said the same. So this is confusing.

Print this item

  EC072 - ACL in the inbound direction
Posted by: gustav - 02-13-2021, 03:22 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum - No Replies

An ACL on the port connection to the web server applied in the inbound direction means the traffic comes from the webserver to the client
(source = webserver, destination = client).
So the correct answer is "permit tcp host 209.165.200.225 eq 80 host 209.165.201.25"

Print this item

  QID:AN253 & QID:AN191
Posted by: ratedr - 02-10-2021, 08:00 PM - Forum: General - Replies (2)

Hey Guys,

I noticed when doing the recently added/modified section the two above question ask the question but have to different answers.

Also is it possible to make the prep test 120 questions just like the actual CCNA exam?

Thanks,

Print this item

  Current ENCOR Questions
Posted by: wangardm - 02-07-2021, 05:21 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum - Replies (1)

Hey guys,

is it right that currently no "router simulations, simlets" in the ENCOR tests?

Thanks and regards
Martin

Print this item

  EC255 - AP connection to WLC
Posted by: gustav - 01-28-2021, 10:30 PM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum - Replies (2)

Decimal 172 is equal to hex value ac, therefore the following solution is correct:

Configure option 43 Hex F104.AC10.3205

Print this item

  Confused about route-maps, prefix-lists, acl's, and distribution-lists
Posted by: IT-Biscuit - 01-16-2021, 06:46 AM - Forum: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Forum - No Replies

So before I start, I am currently CCNA certified and working on CCNP.  I understand this much...

 
  • prefix-lists and access-lists are used to collect a pool of IP's or subnets to compare and contrast from

  • route-maps and distribution-lists look to those prefix-lists and access-lists or other criteria to make a decision on how to handle those pools of IP's, whether to permit them, forward them, block them from entering the AS or routing table.

  • distribution-lists only affect the IP routing table, not the AS topology information, meaning if R1, a DR in an OSPF topology within area 0 were using a distribution-list to block network 192.168.5.0/24 - it would only block it from R1's routing table (show ip route) rather than the OSPF topology (show ip ospf topology) so 192.168.5.0/24 would still propogate to other routers ospf topology and ip routing table if there were no additional filters preventing it from doing so.

  • As for route-maps - they can do alot of stuff from what I'm gathering, blocking or permitting traffic is only one of them, they can also redistribute traffic along another path using a next-hop argument. Anyway though, in this context, a route-map would block the network from the entire AS if its implemented on a ASBR.
Now what I'm having difficulty with are the actual uses of ip-prefix lists or acl's with route-maps and the most effective way to use them. Lets say for example I wanted to redistribute OSPF to EIGRP and there were two ASBR's for the same AS's and I want to tag traffic to ensure that there are no loops...

R3 is between EIGRP 100 and OSPF 1 Area 1

[b]R3 and R7 are ASBR's between OSPF 1 and EIGRP 100[/b]
[b]R5 & R6 have virtual-link configured to give R7 access to Area 0[/b]



[Image: large?v=1.0&px=999]

So now the question.. ..what would be the most effective way to...
Block IP's 10.20.0.0 thru 10.20.5.255 from entering the EIGRP routing table with the least amount of commands?
This is what I did on [b]R3[/b] and [b]R7[/b]

[code]
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter deny 10.20.0.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter deny 10.20.1.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter deny 10.20.5.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter deny 10.20.2.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter deny 10.20.3.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter deny 10.20.4.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter deny 10.20.5.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32

route-map OSPF-EIGRP permit 5
set tag 20
match ip address prefix-list OSPF_Filter
route-map OSPF-EIGRP deny 10
match tag 10
route-map EIGRP-OSPF permit 5
set tag 10
route-map EIGRP-OSPF deny 10
match tag 20

router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500 route-map OSPF-EIGRP
router ospf 1
redistribute eigrp 100 subnets route-map EIGRP-OSPF[/font][/size][/color]
[/code]
Are the tags set correctly above?
I can't help but feel that this approach was very cumbersome and there should be an easier way to approach it with less statements or through summarization. Problem is if I summarize that route in the prefix-list I end up with a 10.20.0.0/28 which will also block unintended networks.
 
  • Can you use route summaries in prefix-lists to block out everything in the summarized route?

  • Can you modify the ge / le qualifiers in this example to only include 10.20.0.0 thru 10.20.5.255?

  • What would happen if my prefix-list instead permitted the routes and denied 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 (is that even necessary, this should be implicitly denied right?) If I did that, how would I implement it on the route-map to block the IP's permitted in the prefix-list? Would this be appropriate or would it block out all routes? Would the below be appropiate? If not, what would be best to filter those nodes out from the EIGRP routing table while keeping it in this syntax (with the prefix-lists permitting).
[code]
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter permit 10.20.0.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter permit 10.20.1.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter permit 10.20.5.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter permit 10.20.2.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter permit 10.20.3.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter permit 10.20.4.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter permit 10.20.5.0/24 le 32
ip prefix-list OSPF_Filter deny 0.0.0.0/0 le 32

route-map OSPF-EIGRP permit 5
set tag 20
route-map OSPF-EIGRP deny 10
match tag 10
match ip address prefix-list OSPF_Filter
route-map EIGRP-OSPF permit 5
set tag 10
route-map EIGRP-OSPF deny 10
match tag 20
[/code]

Print this item

  Passed
Posted by: darkmice99 - 01-16-2021, 12:15 AM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum - No Replies

I took the test today and passed with an 867. There were 105 questions on the exam with 17 questions that were not available on how2pass however what was provided is surely appreciated. Thanks again how2pass, I’ve been a loyal customer for 7 years with more to come.

Print this item

  EC147 - Drag and drop QoS mechanisms
Posted by: gustav - 01-02-2021, 11:51 AM - Forum: CCNP ENCOR 350-401 Forum - Replies (3)

Is the given solution verified?
I thought a service-policy is used to apply a QoS policy (poicy-map) to an interface
and that you can enforce (define) rate-limiting with a policy map.
From a configuration point of view, which data (class-map), which action (policy-map), is imposed on which interface (service-policy).
...and "policing" I would call a technique or mechanism and not a tool, so I am a bit confused by the given solution Huh

Print this item

  I nailed it!!!!
Posted by: Caribbean - 12-29-2020, 05:45 PM - Forum: Exam Experience - No Replies

I passed the CCNA today with an 895. How2Pass is the best study guide around.

Print this item